Skip over navigation
Bike Hugger Jerseys Bike Hugger T-Shirts! Bike Hugger Socks Clip n Seal Publish and Prosper

What's a Sharrow?

Dec 21, 2006  ·  12:10 PM  ·  permalink

They are in the Seattle Bicycle Master Plan. Portland and San Francisco have them already.

other posts tagged: portland, sanfrancisco, seattle, sharrows, urban

Comments
Dec 21 | Ryan Pitman said …

We have those here in Minneapolis. I figured it was just a typical mpls half-hearted attempt at a bike lane and calling itself progressive. The one on Bryant Ave is one traffic lane in each direction with no room for bikes on the side anyway. It’s pretty much useless.

Dec 23 | Fritz said …

Sharrows were pioneered in Denver in the 90s. Fort Collins, CO has sharrows, and I’ve also seen them in Boulder, CO & San Jose, CA. I like ‘em.

Aug 01 | jack said …

these just started popping up all over seattle. what a joke! wait… bikes could use that space before, right? is anything different now that there is a ‘sharrow’ painted on the road? are bikes suddenly safer because there is a little more jack*ss distraction painted on the road? these are the most useless, half-hearted, ridiculous things i’ve ever seen. i can already hear the various politicians in seattle bragging about our increased miles of “bike lanes.” hardy har har — these are more like sucker punches to lure more bicycles out for a pounding. i am not even a bicyclist, nor rabid community builder, but this is such a ludicrous pretense of a pro-bicycle policy that it chafes my hide.

Aug 02 | DL Byron said …

Jack,

I hear ya, but from a cyclists perspective, lines do help. Yes, you can ride in that same space with or without the sharrow. The sharrow is visually indicating that cyclists are going to be in that space. I don’t think it’s a fix to bike lanes, but it’s going to help at least somewhat. See my other post on Sharrows here.

Oct 16 | Columbusite said …

Sharrows, on roads with the right conditions, are far superior to any bike-lane. Virtually impossible to get hit by an opening car door, right-hooked at an intersection, or any of the other myriad problems specific to bike-lanes (which continue to kill cyclists even in that “utopia” of cycling, Portland) when you ride on these streets like you’re supposed to; in the middle of the lane. If you want to stick yourself in the gutter, expose yourself to debris that can flatten your tire, and encourage cars and trucks to pass you within inches of your life by riding in a manner which tells them you don’t belong on the road, you’ll be treated as such.

Oct 21 | Jessica said …

I wouldn’t call them a waste. It lets motorists know that bikes also have the right to share the road. It helps accomodate bicyclists when there isn’t enough right of way space to accomodate the acceptable design of bike lanes, which could cause liability to DOTs. Idiot.

Post a Comment






Comment Policy
We welcome your comments, however all comments are moderated. Offensive or off-topic comments will be deleted and not displayed. Also, please note that comments are owned by the commenter and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bike Hugger or its affiliates.
Search Bike Hugger